
Legendary Danish physicist, Niels Bohr, was known for saying that "an expert is someone who has made all the mistakes that can be made in a narrow scope of practice".
I will assume that you are currently creating your long-term training plan based on some form of periodization model (linear, non-linear, conjugate, block etc). If you are ahead of your game, you might even have my book "The Flexible Periodization Method".
(Not everyone is comfortable with "periodization" and find the concept to be confusing and too theoretical. If this describes you, I recommend that you initially focus on the most basic definition of periodization -"a division into periods".)
Programmes that follow the principles of periodization have been proven to yield better results than programs that do not follow principles of periodization (Study "Designing Resistance Training Programs", by Fleck and Kraemer to learn more).
If you are not basing your long-term training programs on a clear, effective periodization model, then that is 'the mistake of all mistakes!" Let's dive into it!
A great macrocycle plan is based on asking the athlete and or coach about the weak link in training or competition. I have written elsewhere about the 7 categories of weak links, but here they are listed for your convenience
What ever physical capacity the athlete is aiming to improve, the training program to address this particular capacity must be trained for a sufficient number of weeks so that useful training adaptations are created.
The sufficient number of training weeks ranges from 3 to 12 depending on the capacity to be improved, how strongly that capacity is emphasized in the program and the training age of the athlete or client.
If you have more than one main modality of training in your program in any given microcycle, you must consider the influence of each modality of training on the other (Wladimir Issurin writes extensively about this in "Block Periodization").
The key factor that negatively influences a training modality is fatigue from training another training modality. Try having an athlete squat heavy after a 5 km run. He/she may be able to complete the workout but results will not be optimal!
The best results are created when each modality is trained in such a way that the training adaptations are similar and/or mutually enhance each other.
It is important not to use strength and conditioning to improve physical capacities that are developed through the sport specific practice. One of the first things I learned from one of my mentors was how his volleyball players' (national elite level) relative VO2max values where close to 70 even though they where never running! They achieved this through their almost daily 2-hour volleyball practices.
Here is one of the biggest secrets to becoming a great strength coach or personal trainer.
Stop "liking" any exercises!!
Exercise selection made in programs for your athletes or clients must only be based on
If two exercises are equally effective for the athlete and (s)he likes one, give him or her the one she likes and the results will be better!
The athlete has the "luxury" of liking an exercise - you don't!
Each exercise should be used for the appropriate number of training sessions (enough to yield practical significant progress). Then the next presented exercise should be selected carefully to build upon the first. Most often, but not always, each new exercise should allow for gradually more load to be used by the athlete.
Example: You might progress from Dumbbell Bench Press to Barbell Bench Press, but not the other way around. (As a side note, working with the dumbbell variation in the initial training phase allows you to discover and help the athlete correct any possible left-right imbalances.)
Now you know "The Top 5 Mistakes to Avoid When You Create a Long Term Training Program". Avoid these mistakes and your long-term training programs will be significantly more effective!